Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Karakavalasa Sai Santhosh, B. Ramesh
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.53897
Certificate: View Certificate
Expansive soils, commonly referred to as Black cotton soils (BC), possess undesirable engineering properties such as low bearing capacity and high compressibility. To address these challenges, various stabilizers have been used to enhance the strength of expansive soil, including jute fiber and molasses. This thesis focuses on investigating the effects of incorporating jute fiber as a stabilizer and molasses as an additive to improve the properties of expansive soil. The objectives of this study are to enhance the shear strength of expansive soil by blending jute fiber and molasses mixtures. Jute fibers of different lengths (1cm, 2cm, 3cm, and 4cm) and various percentages (0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, and 2%) are used as stabilizers. Molasses is employed as an additional stabilizer with varying percentages (5%, 8%, 12%, and 15%). Laboratory investigations reveal that the addition of 12% molasses and 1.5% jute fiber significantly reduces the liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of the expansive soil, while simultaneously increasing the maximum dry density and California Bearing Ratio (CBR). Furthermore, cyclic load test results demonstrate a 62% improvement in the load carrying capacity of the treated expansive soil subgrade flexible pavement compared to untreated expansive soil flexible pavement. Utilizing construction wastes like molasses offers an alternative to reduce road construction costs, especially in rural areas of developing countries. Additionally, jute fiber provides effective reinforcement for expansive soils. These findings highlight the potential of jute fiber and molasses as sustainable and cost-effective stabilizers for enhancing the performance of expansive soils in construction projects.
I. INTRODUCTION
Flexible pavements are a common choice for road construction due to their ability to accommodate varying traffic loads and provide a smooth and comfortable driving surface. However, one of the major challenges in constructing flexible pavements is dealing with expansive soils, which are known for their undesirable engineering properties such as low bearing capacity and high compressibility. These soils, also referred to as Black cotton soils (BCS), are predominantly found in central states and certain regions of South India.To overcome the limitations posed by expansive soils, various stabilization techniques have been employed. In recent years, the utilization of natural and waste materials as additives has gained attention for its potential to improve the properties of expansive soils and enhance the performance of flexible pavements. This research focuses on the use of two such additives: jute fiber and molasses. Jute fiber, a natural reinforcement material derived from the jute plant, has been widely studied for its ability to enhance the mechanical properties of soils. On the other hand, molasses, a byproduct of the sugar industry, offers potential benefits as a stabilizing agent due to its chemical composition. Both jute fiber and molasses have shown promise in improving the engineering characteristics of expansive soils.This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of incorporating jute fiber and molasses as stabilizers in expansive soil for flexible pavement applications. Laboratory investigations were conducted to evaluate the impact of varying percentages of jute fiber and molasses on the properties of the expansive soil. Key parameters such as liquid limit, plastic limit, plasticity index, maximum dry density, and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) were analyzed to assess the performance of the treated expansive soil. The findings of this research provide valuable insights into the optimal percentages of jute fiber and molasses for treating expansive soil in flexible pavements. The study focuses on the changes in soil properties and the resulting improvements in load-carrying capacity and deformation characteristics observed in the treated soil through cyclic load tests. The implications of these findings for road construction, particularly in rural areas of developing countries, are discussed, highlighting the potential cost-effectiveness and sustainability of utilizing jute fiber and molasses as additives.
Overall, this research contributes to the understanding of the benefits and practical applications of jute fiber and molasses in stabilizing expansive soils for the construction of high-quality and durable flexible pavements..
II. METHODOLOGY
a. Stabilization Procedure: Expansive soil samples were mixed with different percentages of jute fiber and molasses solution in a controlled environment. The jute fiber was added at the chosen lengths and percentages, while the molasses solution was added gradually to achieve the desired percentage.
b. Test Specimen Preparation: The stabilized soil samples were compacted using standard compaction procedures to obtain specimens of uniform density and moisture content. Special care was taken to ensure consistent compaction energy throughout the process.
c. Testing Parameters: The treated soil specimens were subjected to various tests, including California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests, cyclic load tests, and deformation analysis. CBR tests were performed to determine the load-bearing capacity of the treated expansive soil. Cyclic load tests were conducted to evaluate the behavior of the treated soil under repeated loading, simulating real-world conditions.
The methodology outlined above provides a systematic approach for investigating the effects of jute fiber and molasses on the properties of expansive soil. The combination of laboratory testing, statistical analysis, and interpretation of results ensures a comprehensive understanding of the stabilizing potential of these additives for flexible pavement applications.
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
This chapter presents the results of the tests conducted on soil by addition of varying percentage of molasses and varying percentage of jute fiber. The tests were conducted in order to determine the following properties.
A. Soil Properties
The soil used for current study has been taken from MUMMIDIVARAM near Amalapuram area of East Godavari district, AP, India. It is collected from a depth of 2 m. Tests are conducted to determine the Index properties, Engineering properties as per Indian standard (IS 2720). The Soil properties are given in Table
Table : Grain size Distribution of the Expansive soil
S.No |
Property |
Percentage |
|
1. |
Gravel (%) |
1.0 |
|
2. |
Sand (%) |
4.0 |
|
3. |
Fines |
Silt (%) |
10.0 |
Clay (%) |
85.0 |
Table :Physical Properties of Untreated Expansive soil
S.No |
Property |
Symbol |
Untreated Expansive soil |
1. |
Liquid Limit (%) |
WL |
80 |
2 |
Plastic Limit (%) |
WP |
35 |
3. |
Plasticity Index (%) |
IP |
45 |
4. |
Soil Classification |
-- |
CH |
5. |
Specific Gravity |
G |
2.60 |
6. |
Free Swell (%) |
FS |
126 |
7. |
Optimum Moisture Content (%) |
OMC |
26.66 |
8. |
Maximum Dry Density (g/cc) |
MDD |
1.399 |
9. |
CBR (%) |
-- |
1.98 |
B. Molasses Properties
The Molasses collected from the sugar industry, the molasses waste we used in the Present study. Molasses is a very thick, dark brown, syrupy liquid obtained as a by-product in processing cane sugar. It is also called treacle. It contains resinous and some inorganic constituents that render it unfit for human consumption. The molasses are collected from the sugar industry near erode.
Table:Physical Properties of molasses
Constituent |
Cane molasses % |
|
Water |
20 |
|
Organic Constituent |
||
Sugar: fructose |
16 |
|
Saccharose |
32 |
|
Glucose |
14 |
|
Non sugar nitrogenous materials, soluble gummy materials, free and bound acids |
10 |
|
Constituent |
Cane molasses % |
|
In Organic Constituent (ash) |
||
Silicon-Di-Oxide |
0.5 |
|
Potassium Oxide |
3.5 |
|
Calcium Oxide |
1.5 |
|
Magnesium Oxide |
0.1 |
|
Phosphors Oxide |
0.2 |
|
Sodium Oxide |
0.2 |
|
Iron Oxide |
||
Aluminium oxide |
||
Sulphate residue (as SO2) |
1.6 |
|
Chlorides |
1.4 |
|
Total |
100 |
C. Jute Fibre Properties
The Fiber properties are given in table .
Table:Physical Properties of jute Fibre
Property |
Range/Value |
Fibre Length, mm |
20mm |
Fibre Diameter, mm |
0.3-0.45 |
Specific Gravity |
1.3 |
Bulk Density, Kg/,m3 |
1300 |
Ultimate tensile strength N/mm2 |
3400 |
Modulus of Elasticity, N/mm2 |
72 |
Elongation at Break, (%) |
2-3 |
Table :Chemical Composition of jute Fibre
Properties |
Range/Value |
Cellulose (%) |
64.4 |
Hemi-cellulose (%) |
12 |
Ligin (%) |
11.8 |
Pectin (%) |
0.2 |
Waxes (%) |
0.5 |
Moisture Content (%) |
1.1 |
Density (g/cm3) |
1.46 |
Micro-fibrillar angle (0) |
8 |
Price (EUR/kg) |
0.3 |
D. Test Results
Optimum Moisture Content and Maximum Dry Density of Expansive Soil Treated with Various Percentages of molasses.
Table: Compaction Characteristics of Expansive soil treated with percentage of molasses.
Mix Proportion |
Water Content (%) |
Dry Density(g/cc) |
100% Expansive soil |
26.66 |
1.399 |
100% ES + 5% molasses |
24.86 |
1.411 |
100% ES + 8% molasses |
22.96 |
1.423 |
100%ES + 12% molasses |
20.42 |
1.435 |
100%ES + 15% molasses |
19.29 |
1.430 |
Variation of Atterberg limits with percentage variation of molasses
Table: Variation of LL, PL, PI for Expansive soil treated with different percentage of molasses.
% molasses |
LiquidLimit (%) |
Plastic Limit (%) |
Plasticity Index(PI) |
100% Expansive soil |
80 |
35 |
45 |
100% ES + 5% molasses |
76 |
33 |
43 |
100% ES + 8% molasses |
72 |
31 |
41 |
100%ES + 12% molasses |
68 |
29 |
39 |
100%ES + 15% molasses |
65 |
28 |
37 |
Soaked CBR Test Results of Expansive soil treated with different percentages of molasses
Table : CBR Values of Expansive soil treated with Percentage Variations of molasses
Mix Proportions |
CBR (%) |
100% Expansive soil |
1.98 |
100% ES + 5% molasses |
2.465 |
100% ES + 8% molasses |
3.826 |
100%ES + 12% molasses |
4.09 |
100%ES + 15% molasses |
3.95 |
Table:Properties of Expansive soil treated with an optimum of 12% molasses
S.No |
Property |
Symbol |
Expansive soil |
ES+12% molasses |
1 |
Liquid Limit (%) |
WL |
80 |
68 |
2 |
Plastic Limit (%) |
WP |
35 |
29 |
3 |
Plasticity Index (%) |
IP |
45 |
39 |
4 |
Soil Classification |
--- |
CH |
CH |
5 |
Free Swell (%) |
F.S |
126 |
82 |
6 |
Optimum Moisture Content (%) |
O.M.C |
26.66 |
20.42 |
7 |
Maximum DryDensity (g/cc) |
M.D.D |
1.399 |
1.435 |
8 |
CBR (%) |
--- |
1.98 |
4.09 |
E. Discussion-1
As per IRC 37-2001 and 37-2012 the sub grade soil should possess the minimum CBR value of 6%. In the present study molasses treated Expansive soil has exhibited the CBR value of 4.09% which is less as per codes of practice. To achieve required CBR value as per codes of practice, an attempt has been taken to improve the CBR value of molasses treated Expansive soil reinforced with the percentage variation of jute Fibre to suite it as sub grade for flexible pavements.
Index and Engineering Properties for Test Results of Expansive Soil Combined with 12 % of molasses (Optimum) is Reinforced with various percentages of jute Fibre
From above results Table 5 the Soaked CBR value obtained is 4.09%. It is not sufficient for Flexible pavement subgrade is for Low volume Roads as Per IRC37:2012. So the Optimum combination of Expansive soil with 12 % of molasses with different percentages of jute Fibre.
The jute Fibre material was reinforced with the Expansive soil and 12% molasses by hand till uniform mixing was obtained. The jute Fibre was mixed in varying proportions of 0.5%, 1%, 1.5% and 2% of dry weight of the soil.
Optimum Moisture Content and Maximum Dry Density of Expansive Soil with 12% of molasses with Various Percentages of jute Fibre
Table:OMC and MDD Values of the Expansive soil with 12% of molasses with different percentages of jute Fibre.
S.No |
Mix proportion |
Optimum Moisture Content (%) |
Maximum Dry Density (g/cc) |
1 |
Expansive soil |
26.66 |
1.399 |
2 |
100% Expansive soil+12% molasses |
20.42 |
1.435 |
3 |
100% Expansive soil+12% molasses + 0.5% jute Fiber |
18.32 |
1.521 |
4 |
100% Expansive soil+12% molasses + 1.0% jute Fiber |
16.65 |
1.57 |
5 |
100% Expansive soil+12% molasses + 1.5% jute Fiber |
15.05 |
1.596 |
6 |
100% Expansive soil+12% molasses + 2.0% Jute Fiber |
13.25 |
1.580 |
Variation of Atterberg Limits with Percentage of Jute Fibre of Expansive soil with 12% Molasses
Table :Variation of LL, PL, PI for Combination of Expansive soil with 12% molasses with different percentages of Jute Fibre.
|
Mix Proportions |
Liquid Limit (%) |
Plastic Limit (%) |
Plasticity Index (%) |
|
|
100%Expansive soil |
80 |
35 |
45 |
|
|
100%Expansive soil+12% molasses |
68 |
29 |
39 |
|
|
100% Expansive soil+12% molasses + 0.5% jute Fiber |
65 |
25.03 |
39.97 |
|
|
100% Expansive soil+12% molasses + 1.0% jute Fiber |
62 |
23.25 |
38.75 |
|
|
100% Expansive soil+12% molasses + 1.5% jute Fiber |
59 |
21.22 |
37.89 |
|
|
100% Expansive soil+12% molasses + 2.0% Jute Fiber |
57 |
19.95 |
37.05 |
|
Soaked CBR Test Results of combination of Expansive soil with 12 % molasses with different percentages of Jute Fibre
Table 4.12 CBR Values of 12% molasses Treated Expansive soil with Various Percentages of Jute Fibre
|
S.No |
Mix Proportions |
CBR (%) |
|
1 |
100%Expansive soil |
1.98 |
|
2 |
100%Expansive soil+12% molasses |
4.09 |
|
3 |
100% Expansive soil+12% molasses + 0.5% jute Fiber |
4.86 |
|
4 |
100% Expansive soil+12% molasses + 1.0% jute Fiber |
5.788 |
|
5 |
100% Expansive soil+12% molasses + 1.5% jute Fiber |
6.11 |
|
6 |
100% Expansive soil+12% molasses + 2.0% Jute Fiber |
6.10 |
Table :Properties of Treated and Untreated Expansive soil
S.No |
Property |
Symbol |
Expansive soil |
100%ES+ 12% Molasses |
100% ES + 12% molasses+ 1.5% Jute Fiber |
1 |
Liquid limit (%) |
WL |
80 |
68 |
59 |
2 |
Plastic Limit (%) |
WP |
35 |
29 |
21.22 |
3 |
Plasticity Index (%) |
IP |
45 |
39 |
37.89 |
4 |
Soil classification |
---- |
CH |
CH |
CH |
5 |
Optimum Moisture Content (%) |
O.M.C |
26.66 |
20.42 |
15.05 |
6 |
Maximum Dry Density (g/cc) |
M.D.D |
1.399 |
1.435 |
1.596 |
7 |
CBR Value (%) |
----- |
1.98 |
4.09 |
6.11 |
8 |
Differential Free Swell (%) |
DFSI |
126 |
82 |
65 |
F. Discussion-2
From the above study, 12% Molasses treated Expansive soil has exhibited the CBR value of 6.11% on addition of 1.5% Jute Fibre as an optimum. Hence this treated Expansive soil is suitable as sub grade for flexible pavements as per IRC 37-2001 and 37- 2012 codes of practice.
Laboratory Cyclic Plate Load tests on Untreated and Treated Expansive soil Flexible Pavements Using Model Tanks
Cyclic plate load tests were carried out on untreated and treated Expansive soil flexible pavements in separate model tanks under cyclic pressures 500kPa, 560kPa, 630kPa, 700kPa, 1000kPa,1400kPa,2000kPa. The tests were conducted until the failure of the Expansive soil model flexible pavements at OMC conditions.
Laboratory Cyclic Plate Load Test Results of Untreated Expansive Soil with Model Flexible Pavement at OMC
Figure shows the laboratory cyclic plate load test results of untreated Expansive soil with model flexible pavement at OMC. The Untreated Expansive soil with model flexible pavement has exhibited the ultimate cyclic pressure of 630kN/m2 with the deformation of 2.61mm at OMC.
Table :Laboratory Cyclic Plate Load Test Results of Treated and Untreated Expansive Soil with Model Flexible Pavements at OMC
S.No |
Sub-grade soil |
Sub- base |
Base Course |
Pressure (kPa) |
Settleme nts (mm) |
1 |
Untreated Expansive soil subgrade with Model flexible pavement |
Gravel |
WBM-III |
630 |
2.61 |
2 |
12% molasses and 1.5% jute Fibre treated Expansive soil subgrade with model flexible pavement |
Gravel |
WBM-III |
1600 |
2.10 |
IV. DISCUSSION
Hence, from the present laboratory investigations, it was concluded that the expansive soil treated with 12% molasses and 1.5% jute Fibre as an optimum exhibits satisfactory results as per IRC 37-2001 & 2012 Codes of practice.
V. SCOPE FOR FURTHER WORK
The following areas are identified as the scope of further research in this direction, based on the experience of the present work.
Optimum percentage of fibres and molasses observed during the laboratory investigations are summarized and presented in the following table. Table :Optimum percentage of molasses and jute Fibre observed during the laboratory investigations S.No Additives Optimum percentage addition 1 Molasses 12% 2 Jute Fibre 1.5% Based on the laboratory studies conducted in this research, the following conclusions were drawn: 1) The optimum percentages of molasses and jute fiber were found to be 12% and 1.5%, respectively, for treating expansive soil. 2) The addition of 1.5% jute fiber to molasses-treated expansive soil resulted in a 35.59% decrease in liquid limit compared to untreated expansive soil. Similarly, the addition of 12% molasses decreased the liquid limit of untreated expansive soil by 17.64%. 3) The plastic limit of molasses-treated expansive soil decreased by 64.93% with the addition of 1.5% jute fiber, while the plastic limit of untreated expansive soil decreased by 20.68% with the addition of 12% molasses. 4) The plasticity index of molasses-treated expansive soil decreased by 18.76% with the addition of 1.5% jute fiber, compared to a decrease of 15.38% with the addition of 12% molasses in untreated expansive soil. 5) The ideal moisture content of molasses-treated expansive soil was reduced by 30.55% with the addition of 12% molasses, and further reduced by 77.14% with the addition of 1.5% jute fiber, compared to untreated expansive soil. 6) The maximum dry density of molasses-treated expansive soil increased by 14.08% with the addition of 1.5% jute fiber, while the maximum dry density of untreated expansive soil increased by 2.57% with the addition of 12% molasses. 7) The soaked C.B.R. (California Bearing Ratio) value of expansive soil increased by 106% with the addition of 12% molasses, and by 208% with the addition of 1.5% jute fiber, compared to untreated expansive soil. 8) The cyclic plate load test results showed that the ultimate cyclic stress of treated expansive soil subgrade flexible pavement improved by 620kPa to 1000Pa, compared to untreated expansive soil. 9) The total deformations of treated marine clay subgrade flexible pavement improved by 24.30% compared to expansive soil, as observed from the cyclic plate load test results. 10) The load-carrying capacity of treated expansive soil subgrade flexible pavement increased by 154% compared to untreated pavement, as determined from the laboratory cyclic load test. 11) The soaked C.B.R. values of expansive soil stabilized with molasses and jute fiber met standard specifications, exhibiting a 208% improvement. 12) The use of molasses and jute fiber as additives provides effective reinforcement to expansive soils, offering cost-effective solutions for road construction, particularly in rural areas of developing countries.
[1] A Gens, E EAlsono (1992), “A framework for the behavior of unsaturated expansive soils, Canadian Geotechnical Journal. [2] Agarwala, V.S and Khanna, J.S (1969), Construction techniques for foundations of buildings on black cotton soils [3] Akshaya Kumar Sabat, Stabilization of Expansive Soil Using Waste Ceramic Dust [4] Al-khafaji, Wadi Amir and Orlando B. Andersland “Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Testing” [5] Amu et al. (2005) “Cement and fly ash mixture for stabilization of expansive soil. [6] Arrora, K. R. (2001), Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. R. D. Holtz and W.D. Kovacs, an Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering. New York: Prentice Hall, 1981. [7] Bahler et al. (2007) “Stabilization of expansive soils using lime and class C fly ash. [8] Baser, O. (2009) “Stabilization of expansive soils using waste marble dust,” Master of Science thesis submitted to Civil Engineering Department, Middle East,Technical University. [9] Baytar (2005) “Stabilization of expansive soil using the fly ash and desulpho gypsum obtained from thermal power plant. [10] Bhasin et al. (1988) “A laboratory study on the stabilization of black cotton soil as a pavement material using RHA, Bagasse ash, fly ash, lime sludge and black sulphite liquor. [11] Bolt G.H. (1956), “Physico-chemical analysis of the compressibility of pure soils. [12] Casangrane, A. “The Structure of Soil and Its Importance in Foundation Engineering,” Journal Bostan Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 19, 1932. [13] Chandra sekhar et a l. (20 01) “characteristics of black cotton soil with stabilizing agents like calcium chloride and sodium chloride in comparison with conventional RHA lime stabilization. [14] Chen, F. H. (1988), “Foundations on expansive soils”, Chen & Associates, Elsevier Publications U.S.A. [15] Das, M. Braja, (1997) “Advanced soil mechanics” [16] Dayakar et a l. (2003) “A laboratory investigation for stabilizing the expansive soil using silica fume and tannery sludge with percentage variation of solid wastes”. [17] El-Aziz et al. (2004) “The effect of the engineering properties of soils when blended with lime and silica fume. [18] Gromko (1974) Study of Shrinking and Swelling soil. [19] Gupta et al. (2002) “Study on the stabilization of black cotton soil using quarry dust. [20] I.S: 2720, Part VII, (1980), Determination of Water Content Dry Density Relation Using Light Compaction. [21] I.S: 2720-Part III, Section I (1980), Determination Specific Gravity. [22] I.S: 2720-Part IV, 1975, Determination of Grain Size Distribution. [23] I.S: 2720-Part V, 1970, Determination of Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit. [24] IRC: 37-2001, “Guide lines for the Design of Flexible Pavements”. [25] Jain and Jain (2006) “Study on the effect of addition of stone dust and nylon fiber on black cotton soil. [26] Jennings and Knight (1957), “The additional settlement of foundations due to a collapse of structure of sandy subsoil on wetting”. [27] K.Ramus, R.D.Babu et al. “A study on the swelling behavior of expansive soil treated with VPW and Lime”, IGC, Pune. [28] Koyuncu et al. (2004) “Stabilization of expansive soil using three types of ceramic waste namely, ceramic mud wastes (CMW), Crushed ceramic tile wastes (CCTW) and Ceramic tile dust wastes (CTDW)” . [29] Kumar et a l. (2007) “The effect of polyester fiber inclusions and lime stabilization on the geotechnical characteristics of fly ash-expansive soil mixtures”. [30] Mishra and Mathur (2004) “Stabilization of Expansive soil with phosphogypsum”. [31] Muntohar and Hantoro (2000) “Rice husk ask and lime for stabilization of expansive soil by blending them together”. [32] Pandian et al. (2001) “Stabilization of Expansive soil with Class F Fly ash. [33] Phani Kumar and Rajesh (2006) “Experiment al study of expansive soil beds stabilized with fly ash columns and fly ash-lime columns”. [34] Phani Kumar and Sharma (2007) “Studied the effect of fly ash on swelling of a highly plastic expansive soil and compressibility of another non-expansive high plasticity soil”. [35] R.D Babu et al (2015) “Efficiency of calcium chloride and vitrified tiles sludge on the strength characteristics of Expansive soil”, IJARET, Vol-2, Issue 3 (July-Sept 2015). [36] Rajan and Subramanyam (1982) “Shear strength and consolidation characteristics of expansive soil stabilized with RHA and Lime”. [37] Rajan Gopal and Rao. A.S.R. “Basic and applied soil mechanics”. [38] Ramaiah, B.K., et.al (1972), Stabilization of black cotton soil with lime and Rice-Husk-Ash, Indian Geotechnical Society, Proc. Tech. Sessions, Vol. 1, New Delhi, 1972. [39] Rama krishna and Pradeep Kumar (2006) “Effect of Rice husk ash and cement on engineering properties of black cotton soil.
Copyright © 2023 Karakavalasa Sai Santhosh, B. Ramesh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET53897
Publish Date : 2023-06-09
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here